Magazines:  Real Estate Shopping: Adult Costumes  |  Kids Costumes  |  Car Books  |  Guitars |  Electronics
This Issue Archived Articles Blog About Us Contact Us

Management Mods

We talk to an industry expert about the pros and cons of different approaches to modified management systems...

By Michael Knowling

Click on pics to view larger images

This article was first published in 2003.

When you've treated your car a few breathing mods you'll invariably encounter someone telling you to "make engine management changes". But what exactly does this mean? Do they mean fit an interceptor, a piggyback ECU or a stand-alone aftermarket management system? In this article we'll look into some of the pros and cons of each approach.


Click for larger image

Interceptors are gaining popularity as many current-generation cars are becoming increasingly difficult to reprogram or convert to stand-alone programmable management. An interceptor is a computer that is wired between the engine and ECU. The interceptor alters various inputs and outputs from the ECU. Depending on the particular unit, an interceptor typically gives laptop programmable control over mixtures, ignition timing and boost pressure.

David Alexander from Sydney's Silverwater Automotive says, "An interceptor is a relatively simple way around typical problems. If you want to run a bit more boost, clamp the boost cut and trim fuel numbers without touching anything else, they can be great."

Click for larger image
"The disadvantage of an interceptor," he says, "is you can't adjust rev limit, idle strategies or any of the functions that don't rely on the load sensor or crank sensor.

"You can move the crank sensor input to change timing and, depending on the specifics of the engine, the window of adjustment can be quite large.

"Trying to do fuel adjustment by modifying the load input or a temperature input limits you to the factory tabling. Sometimes that's fine, but not if the engine has a lot of modification.

"If, say, you've changed the camshaft and compression ratio, you really do need to access the more discreet functions like idle control strategies, the point when you want it to go into closed loop, lean burn and knock sensor control adjustment."

David Alexander suggests that you can do all of those things inside factory Holden Delco software.

Stand-Alone Programmable Management

Click for larger image

As mentioned, stand-alone programmable systems are becoming increasingly difficult to fit into current-generation vehicles. This is because body circuitry (security systems, etc) are often integrated into a single management computer. This integration means the previous trend of ripping out the factory ECU is no longer an option.

Stand-alone programmable systems give terrific tuning flexibility - particularly the high-end models. Stand-alone systems allow the tuner to alter the amount of fuelling and timing at adjustable rpm and load points, change the rev limit, adjust cam timing, idle speed, boost pressure, set various outputs (for shift lights, extra injectors, etc) and more.

Click for larger image
But David Alexander points out that many aftermarket programmable systems do not have knock control.

"This can be a concern for a streetcar," he says. "Manufacturers employ quite active knock control, which add and subtract timing almost like closed-loop fuel control. If the driver puts a crappy batch of fuel into the tank or the engine condition is not covered by the parameters in the management program, knock sensing is a great safeguard to save the engine.

"There are some aftermarket management systems with knock sensing. Link has had it for some time, allowing you to pull timing out when it sees a predetermined amount of knock. It's not a bad idea - it's certainly a lot better than breaking an engine. The Link will pull timing out and when you turn the key off and start it again, it will go back to your original map - it won't save the changes.

"Most of the people that want their car to perform put good fuel in their engine. Ninety-nine percent of our customers understand that because they want it tuned closer to the edge - so I don't think the absence of knock control in some programmable systems is so much of an issue," says David.

The Piggyback Approach

Click for larger image
A piggyback computer is a fully programmable computer that works in tandem with the factory ECU, but in a very different way to an interceptor. Instead of modifying the inputs and output signals from the ECU, a piggyback arrangement typically involves fitting a programmable computer to control only the injectors and ignition system - power steering compensation, idle control and all other functions are left to the factory ECU. This configuration allows the tuner to adjust vital fuelling and ignition without interfering with the integrated security system etc.

Click for larger image
But there are limitations.

A piggyback ECU cannot work together with a stability or traction control system (like the Ford BA XR6T). Furthermore you'll lose the operation of the trip computer fitted to some cars.

Remapping the Factory ECU

Click for larger image

A remap of the factory ECU is the most elegant approach to engine modification. It allows 100 percent of the factory ECU functionality to be retained without the fitment of any aftermarket products. But there are varying limits to what you can achieve...

Depending on the complexity of an ECU and how much effort has been put into 'cracking' it, only a small number of maps may be able to be accessed by the tuner. This limits tuning flexibility and compromises the end result - in other words, stay away from re-maps where the tuner has minimal access to the factory program.

On the other hand, some tuners have access to the whole management program.

If you own a late-model Subaru WRX, a Gen 3 Holden Commodore or a Delco managed vehicle (such as a VN-onward Holden Commodore or JE Camira) you're fortunate enough that the entire program inside the factory ECU has been reverse-engineered. This enables the tuner to access timing data upon knock, alter the rev limit, closed-loop changeover and more. Taking into account cost, the stealth nature of the modification, tuning access and the potential for an excellent end result, this approach is extremely attractive. However, few cars are lucky enough to have their factory ECU fully reverse-engineered.


As David Alexander points out, interceptors are a relatively simple way around typical problems. They are ideal for making tweaks to go along with mild mechanical changes. "There's no question interceptors will become more popular as factory systems become harder to work with," he says.

Stand-alone programmable systems remain there for the most hard-core modified engines that require extensive mapping modification. A programmable ECU fitted as a piggyback means easier installation and more factory features are retained, but you'll lose traction and stability control systems as well as trip computer functions. This may not be an issue in some vehicles.

Due the huge variation in tuning ability from vehicle to vehicle, factory ECU remaps cannot be put into one basket. If access to the factory program is minimal, you can expect the end result to be poor. Fully reverse-engineered ECUs have the potential to perform brilliantly.

"The skills of the tuner are vitally important, whatever the approach you take," says David.


Silverwater Automotive Services
02 9748 1300

Did you enjoy this article?

Please consider supporting AutoSpeed with a small contribution. More Info...

Share this Article: 

More of our most popular articles.
Riding a DIY electric bike

DIY Tech Features - 18 February, 2005

Building an Electric Bike Part 3

Igor Sikorsky's brainchild

Technical Features - 18 May, 2010

The First Helicopter

Making a new airbox intake - but did it improve performance?

DIY Tech Features - 8 February, 2011

Powering-Up the 1.9 litre TDI, Part 2

Achievable and real-world ways to reduce your fuel bill

Special Features - 25 August, 2008

Improving Fuel Economy

DIY Module that can pulse horns, lights or solenoids

DIY Tech Features - 23 June, 2008

The eLabtronics Pulser, Part 1

Improve BOTH power and fuel economy!

DIY Tech Features - 9 September, 2008

Auto Air Conditioner Controller

Battery monitoring like you've never seen it before

DIY Tech Features - 3 September, 2013

One very smart LED

There are good technical reasons why steam could return

Technical Features - 9 October, 2007

Alternative Cars, Part 5 - Steam

How Mitsubishi developed the vortex generators on the Lancer

Special Features - 3 October, 2006

Blowing the Vortex, Part 2

A revolutionary fuel saving device that works

Columns - 25 August, 2009

FuelSmart, Part 2

Copyright © 1996-2019 Web Publications Pty Limited. All Rights ReservedRSS|Privacy policy|Advertise
Consulting Services: Magento Experts|Technologies : Magento Extensions|ReadytoShip