Magazines:  Real Estate Shopping: Adult Costumes  |  Kids Costumes  |  Car Books  |  Guitars |  Electronics
This Issue Archived Articles Blog About Us Contact Us

Springs and Natural Frequencies

The physics of the bounce

by Julian Edgar

Click on pics to view larger images

At a glance...

  • Spring rates
  • Static deflection
  • Natural frequencies
  • Why they're important
Email a friend     Print article
This article was first published in 2007.

Sometimes it’s easy to lose the wood for the trees: to forget the fundamentals and think only of the outcomes. Suspension is one area where that happens a lot. So let’s take a step back and think about springs.

Nearly all current cars use steel coil springs. The springs are there to support the weight of the car’s body while still allowing it to move up and down – or, more accurately, for the wheels to move up and down while the body stays still.

Spring Rate and Static Deflection

Springs vary in their rate, that is, how much they compress for a given weight placed on top. Put 1 kilogram on top of a vertical compression coil spring and its height might be reduced by 1mm. In that case, the rate of the spring is termed 1 kg/mm. If you put 2kg on top of such a spring, it will sink by 2mm. Put 20 kg on top of the spring and it will sink by 20mm. And so on. Rates of springs are also often expressed in pounds per inch, but the same idea applies.

Let’s say we have a small car that has a nice round mass figure of 1000kg, distributed on all four wheels equally. Furthermore, we’ll say that the spring compresses by the same amount that each wheel moves upwards. (That is, the wheel and spring rates are the same.)

The amount the spring compresses with the car’s 250kg weight on top (this is called the static compression) is determined by the spring rate that we chose. So, with 250kg on top of each spring, a chosen spring rate of 1 kg/mm will result in the spring compressing by 250mm – or about 10 inches. Remember, that’s where the car sits in its static position – to cater for bumps in the road, we’re going to need the spring to still have plenty of travel left. And with 250mm of static spring deflection, arranging even more travel is going to be difficult unless the car has a way high ride height and an incredibly long travel suspension.

So let’s stiffen the spring rate to 3kg/mm. Now, with the same 250kg acting to compress the spring, it will shorten by only (250/3 =) 83mm, or 3.3 inches. If we have a total suspension travel of 200mm (8 inches), that will put the car 40 per cent down the full suspension travel when it’s sitting there, unloaded. (So what’s ‘full suspension travel’ then? Full travel is the vertical distance from maximum bump [that’s the suspension as compressed as possible] to full droop [which is when the suspension is as extended as possible, the entire car’s weight off the springs] .

With the suspension compressed by 83mm of the available 200mm, there seems to be plenty of room for further travel to absorb bumps. And in fact, even if the static weight of the car doubled (ie there’s 1g of upwards acceleration over a bump), only 166mm of the available 200mm travel would be used up - so there would still be some left over.

Trouble is, this analysis ignores the weight of passengers and luggage. If the unloaded compression of the springs (with 250kg acting through each) is 83mm, add four people at 100kg each and the suspension travel that's used up increases to 117mm - that’s 117mm of the available 200mm. If you now hit a 1g vertical bump, there won’t be sufficient travel left to absorb it.

That’s why 1000kg cars with four 100kg people in them don’t like big bumps...and why bump stops are a prerequisite!

So why use a suspension rate that deflects by so much with just the static weight? Why not use a stiffer springs that allow more room for bump absorption, even with our four 100kg people on board?

There are two parts to that answer. The first is that in addition to bump absorption capability, you also want rebound travel – that is, you want the wheels to stay in contact with the road when the car meets a hollow in the road. The suspension must be able to droop sufficiently for the wheels to do this – and also enough to keep the inside wheels in contact with the road when body roll occurs in cornering. If you have a static ride height only 10mm down into the travel, you’ll have (in a worse case scenario) only about 10mm of droop capability.

But the most important reason why you want to use springing that allows plenty of static deflection is because of what is called natural frequency.

Natural Frequency

Click for larger image

Imagine a coil spring out of the car sitting vertically on the ground. You place a weight on it (yep, the spring deflects proportionally with its rate) and then you carefully push the weight downwards and release it. The weight will bounce up and down at the spring’s natural frequency. Over time the bounces will die away (they’ll get smaller) but they’ll continue to occur at a certain number of cycles per second, or Hertz (Hz), until the spring is still.

The same applies to springs in a car suspension system – the suspension has a natural frequency of up/down bounces. Importantly, the fact that you might have dampers in the system makes very little difference to the natural frequency!

When thinking about suspension systems, natural frequency is almost never considered. However, it is vital for two reasons. Firstly, in terms of ride comfort, the human body likes to sit on a system that has a natural frequency of about 1Hz, or 1 up/down cycle per second. Secondly, as the natural frequency of the suspension numerically increases, it gets excited far more easily by road bumps, making control of the spring more difficult. In short, a lot more of the vertical accelerations of bumps get through to the cabin.

So what determines natural frequency? For a given car it depends on how much the springs compress when the static weight of the car is lowered onto them. And is the natural frequency number easy to work out? Yep! The natural frequency in cycles per minute (divide by 60 to get Hertz) can be found by: 188 divided by the square root of the static deflection, measured in inches.

So in our example above, we ended up with a static deflection of 3.3 inches. This suspension therefore has a natural frequency of 1.7Hz. That’s quite a long way above our optimal-for-ride natural frequency of 1Hz, but the only way of getting a lower number is to increase the static deflection, which in turn means we need to have a greater total suspension travel if we’re still to be able to absorb bumps.

But what if we don’t care much about ride – we want the stiffer suspension that will help control pitch and roll? Then we’ll be in the range of 2 – 2.5Hz for sporting cars. (Typical sedans are in the range of 1 – 1.5Hz.)

Some of this we know intuitively – we’ve just never thought about it in detail.

Think of off-road racing buggies. If you go in one you’ll find the ride very good, even on stuff which wouldn’t unduly tax a normal car. But why would a race car ride well on a surface on which it seldom if ever sees? The answer is that the suspension has a very low natural frequency. After all, some of these vehicles have a suspension travel of 20 inches... which if the static deflection is 10 inches, gives a natural frequency of 1Hz! So It might be a race car but it’s likely to have a ride better than most limousines...

The other example is how we’ve all experienced how cars ride better with extra people in them. If the car has a static suspension deflection of 4 inches, the natural frequency of the suspension is 1.6Hz. If the static deflection increases by another 1.5 inches when 4 people get in the car (giving a total static deflection of 5.5 inches), the natural frequency of the suspension has decreased to 1.3Hz. That’s why the ride has improved! (Of course, if there is insufficient suspension travel and the extra static deflection causes the bump-stops to be hit, then that’s another story...)

Static Deflection and Natural Frequency

So what do you need for a good result?

Well, you need plenty of static deflection in order that the natural frequency of the suspension is low – certainly below 2.5Hz, which means not less than about 38mm (1.5 inches) static deflection. However, clearly that minimum figure limits droop capability quite a lot. (Sometimes, eg in the back suspension of front-wheel drive cars, having short droop capability may not be a handling disadvantage. Flying the inner rear wheel will promote rather quicker changes in direction!) Secondly, to get plenty of static deflection, the spring rate will need to be relatively low, in turn requiring that you have a lot of travel to allow you to absorb bumps without bottoming-out.

If you’re designing a car from scratch (or making really wholesale changes to suspension units), it’s important that you keep a long-travel suspension capability. That’s not just so that big bumps can be absorbed but also so you can keep the natural frequency relatively low. This also has implications for ride height – you don’t want the body dragging on the ground on big bumps.

If you’re modifying an existing car with the usual springs and shocks swaps, springs that lower the ride height will be stiffer (so the car doesn’t bottom-out on the same size bumps) and so will have a higher natural frequency. In addition to ride implications, this also means the tyres are more likely to get excited by typical road surfaces – requiring strong damping.


If you reckon you’ve got you head around all that, think of trucks and buses for a moment.

If a truck has a mass acting on the back wheels of 8 tonnes, but can easily have 16 tonnes added in load, the springs are clearly going to have to be pretty stiff to cope with the maximum load. In turn that means a short static deflection in an unloaded state, which means a high natural frequency. And if you’ve ever ridden in an unladen truck, you’ll know how horrible the ride is.

Click for larger image

But what about buses? Sometimes they might have two people in them (say a 150kg load) but at other times 40 people in them (3000kg load). How do you spec the suspension to give a comfortable ride in both configurations? The answer is with air springs. If you can inflate the springs to always have (say) 8 inches of static deflection, you’ll be able to maintain a natural frequency of 1.1Hz, irrespective of load.

We don’t reckon knowing about natural frequencies of suspension is going to immediately allow you to make profound and effective changes to your car’s suspension. But we do think it’s an important element in understanding what’s going on when the car wheels are moving up and down beneath you....

Did you enjoy this article?

Please consider supporting AutoSpeed with a small contribution. More Info...

Share this Article: 

More of our most popular articles.
What you need to know about arc welding

DIY Tech Features - 20 June, 2007

Beginners' Guide to Welding, Part 1

Designing for body stiffness

Technical Features - 14 December, 2010

One Very Stiff Body!

Igor Sikorsky's brainchild

Technical Features - 18 May, 2010

The First Helicopter

A forgotten Japanese classic

Special Features - 6 January, 2009

Mitsubishi Colt Fastback

Inside the construction of some aluminium cars

Technical Features - 2 September, 2008

Aluminium Cars

DIY testing of your engine's water pump

Technical Features - 11 June, 2008

Water Pump Testing

The electronics of diesel engine fuel systems

Technical Features - 29 January, 2007

Common Rail Diesel Engine Management, Part 2

A few cars to keep an eye out for

Special Features - 6 April, 2010

Collecting Japanese Cars

Why turbo engines give better fuel economy

Technical Features - 13 February, 2008

Turbo'd For Fuel Economy

Drives like a big engine... but drinks like a little one! How do you achieve that?

Special Features - 23 March, 2010

The Confidence Trick

Copyright © 1996-2017 Web Publications Pty Limited. All Rights ReservedRSS|Privacy policy|Advertise
Consulting Services: Magento Experts|Technologies : Magento Extensions|ReadytoShip