In the petrol engine models, the new Honda Civic
is a brilliant car – frugal on fuel, roomy inside, good in ride and handling. So
what’s it like when you add a fourth generation Honda hybrid battery electric
Well, the answer is not unambiguously positive.
Yes, the hybrid Civic gets excellent fuel economy
– clearly better than the more expensive diesel competitors that we’ve driven
like the Peugeot 307 HDi – and at AUD$31,990, is substantially cheaper than the
base model Toyota Prius over which it has more equipment, especially in the
number of airbags.
But in the driving – especially in city conditions
– it is well behind the Prius and the calibration of some aspects of the
electric system had us quite puzzled.
The main problem is intrinsic to the Honda system.
Unlike the Prius, which mounts its electric motors in what can be termed the
gearbox, Honda’s Integrated Motor Assist places the electric motor on the end of
the engine’s crankshaft. Simply put, the electric motor cannot propel the car
forward without the petrol engine also turning. In this latest Honda approach,
the engine’s valve openings can be configured to effectively decompress the
engine, thus enabling the electrics to power the car in certain narrowly defined
conditions without having to push against engine compression. But in the vast
majority of cases, if the car is moving forward, the petrol engine is
That might not sound like a big deal but step out
of a Prius, where - like the Honda - the engine stops when you stop, and the
Civic’s petrol engine seems to be drinking fuel on dozens of occasions when the
car should be drifting forward on electric power alone. The best example is in a
slow moving traffic jam. In these conditions, the Prius petrol engine will stay
off for hundreds of metres at a time. In the hybrid Civic, each time you lift
the brake pedal (even if it’s just to roll down a slight incline), the engine
restarts. The constant engine on, engine off, engine on, engine off is
irritating and can at times feel quite jerky. In this respect the system is
light-years behind the Prius, and it could be argued, even inferior to the
original IMA system in the manual transmission 2001 Insight which at least
allowed you to roll forward with the engine off.
The calibration of the electric assist is also a
little odd. Even when the high voltage battery is full (battery level is shown
on a dash gauge), the degree of electric assist that occurs at small throttle
openings is subdued. So as an example, if you’ve driven down a long hill and the
battery has been topped-up through regenerative braking, you’d then expect
to see better fuel economy as the system actively use up that stored energy. But
the Civic has none of that: it’s frustrating to see the instantaneous fuel
consumption gauge at the maximum of 12 litres/100km during acceleration – and
the electric assist gauge showing that little or no electric power is being
drawn from the full battery to help the car along. The system is also calibrated
to keep the high voltage battery level quite high - so there’s not a lot of room
left for power storage from regenerative braking.
We’re sure Honda engineers must have very good
reasons for these calibration decisions, but they’re not clear to us.
But what is clear is the way they’ve calibrated
the continuously variable transmission (CVT). Generally it keeps engine revs low
– below 3000 rpm. This means that as you drive around the city normally, the
Civic Hybrid is very quiet and refined. Apart from tyre noise on some surfaces,
in these conditions the car has NVH (noise vibration harshness) of a car many
classes more expensive. And it must be pointed out, this scenario represents the
majority of driving.
But floor the throttle and the tacho leaps to 3000
rpm, the CVT then allowing revs to slowly rise to the redline. Trouble is, the
engine has by now become loud and harsh, with tinny resonances making themselves
felt as the tacho needle moves slowly around the dial. The contrast from
absolute smoothness and quietness to an unbecoming shriek is quite amazing. At
high revs the 1.3 litre four cylinder engine simply doesn’t feel like a
Although in the Prius revs also rise with load,
the result is far more refined.
So what’s the fuel economy like? We recorded 5.5
litres/100km over a variety of driving conditions, although they were biased a
bit towards the highway. That’s a little worse than the Prius, but still
excellent economy in anyone’s language. As a direct comparison, it’s 24 per cent
better than we recorded in similar conditions in the current 1.8 litre VTi
Civic, and much better than the previous model Civic Hybrid in which we achieved
The available performance depends a fair bit on
how much noise you want: when driven at full throttle, it’s quite adequate
(although never grunting-fast-off-the-line like the Prius) and when driven
gently, it can paradoxically feel more torquey. The combined power and torque
figures of the electric motor and petrol engine are 85kW and 170Nm respectively.
Getting away from the driveline, how’s the rest of
the car? Well, it’s excellent. Inside the cabin you’ll find a welcoming and
roomy space. Unlike some much more expensive European cars we’ve recently
sampled, the Civic shows thoughtful, well executed design. The door pockets –
all four of them – are large; there are compartments everywhere in the dash and
centre console; and the seats – newly designed for this model – are wide,
comfortable and supportive. However, if you’re a driver of just the right
(wrong) size, your left knee will annoyingly touch the handbrake lever rather
than the smooth side of the console.
The steering wheel is height- and reach-adjustable
and the driver’s seat is height adjustable. The instruments are arranged in two
binnacles, one above the other. The lower contains a centrally-mounted analog
tacho and electronic bargraphs for electric assist/regeneration and high voltage
battery level. This space also houses the warning lights. Directly above, the
second binnacle mounts a large digital speedo and electronic bargraphs for fuel
and coolant temperature (the latter switchable to instantaneous fuel
consumption). These displays are easy to read (even through sunglasses) and the
speedo is especially effective, being only a tiny eye movement away from the
road. All the controls are clear and work with a quality feel.
The equipment level is excellent – six airbags,
dual trip fuel consumption readout, cruise control, ABS - and the 6-stack MP3 CD
sound system is very good in this class. Electronic stability control – while
offered in other markets - is not available.
Step into the back through the wide-opening rear
doors and there’s plenty of knee and foot-room, although for the very tall,
headroom is limited. The boot is large but the boot opening is only class
average and the rear seat does not fold. The boot also doesn’t have an external
unlocking handle and there’s no boot unlocking button on the key remote.
The Hybrid has some aerodynamic tweaks over the
other Civics, reducing the drag coefficient of the body from 0.31 to 0.27. These
changes include flush alloy wheels, a bootlid spoiler and additional engine and
underfloor covers. While Honda doesn’t say so, the ride height also looks a
little lower than other Civic models.
So what to make of this car?
In some conditions the Civic Hybrid is quite
brilliant. A longish daily freeway or highway commute would see it in almost its
ideal environment – refined, comfortable, capacious, adequately quick and
extremely frugal on fuel. But in other conditions the Civic Hybrid is
disappointing. A daily dose of slow moving city traffic mixed with the need for
assertive lane changing would find the Civic Hybrid driver frustrated at the
noise and the engine on/off cycling. Fuel economy in these conditions would also
From the perspectives of cost, fuel economy,
interior space and features, the Civic hybrid is an excellent car. But Honda’s
hybrid system needs more sorting – there’s nothing wrong with the
petrol/electric philosophy but its execution requires refinement.
Civic Hybrid was provided for this test by Honda Australia